We're moving...

KS2 Problema is moving... hell, we pretty much have moved.

We hope you'll join us here at our brand new home.* 

(Although even it may be temporary. It's currently hosted on the WordPress servers. We're weighing a switch to storing the content on our own servers and database.)

Right wing anti-government activist who threatened Pelosi lived in federally subsidized housing.

The conservative, anti-government activist who attended tea party events and protests and who was recently arrested for a long series of threats to US Senator Barbara Boxer was plenty mad at free-spending big government -- but that didn't stop him from taking advantage of federally subsidized housing intended for the disadvantaged.

Turns out that 48 year old Gregory Lee Giusti wasn't just mad at the liberal California Democrat.

In fact, it was another victim of his tirades and threats that helped authorities get the goods on Giusti -- or rather victims, plural. In this case, it was the Baptist Church Giusti joined in 1999 but was asked to leave in 2005 because of menacing behavior. He had apparently been harassing them in a series of anonymous phone calls over the last five years. So when the feds were looking into at least four dozen calls to Pelosi's home and offices and found numerous calls from Giusti to officials with the church, they discovered yet another faced of the complex Mr Giusti's activities.

Oh yeah, and he was also arrested in 2004 for threatening to kill a conductor after being removed from a train in San Mateo.

But, really, the cherry on top has got to be that Giusti, railing bitterly about big government, was the recipient of federal housing aid.

Sweet.

Get the whole ludicrous -- but scary -- story at the San Francisco Chronicle.

Monday 29 March 2010: Palin defends gun imagery; end-of-times Christian militia arrested for police slaughter plan

Item [NY Daily News]: Sarah Palin defends her use of "hunting" language and imagery in her political action committee's website and other materials in wake of violent threats against Democratic politicians and officials and attacks on Democratic Party offices.

Item [CNN]: An indictment unsealed today alleges an anti-government militia with ultraconservative fundamentalist religious views planned on killing a law enforcement officer, perhaps along with his family members, in an ambush and then, when the throng of police the group believed would gather to mourn their brother officer's murder collected for memorial services, the group would launch a coordinated attack using automatic weapons, rocket launchers and shaped explosive charges (aka IEDs) -- all in the hopes of starting a battle between those they considered Christian true believers like themselves and those they saw to be the forces of the Anti-Christ: police, federal law enforcement, and US soldiers.


File under: 'nuff said

Loyalty, Palin-style

Sarah Palin has come under increasing pressure from crtics and former supporters alike for her campaign's use of violent imagery and language -- a map on her website "targets" Democrats holding vulnerable seats with gunsights and Palin says it's "time to reload" following the unsuccessful Republican bid to block health care reform -- but, while she has denounced violence in the wake of a number of attacks on Democratic political and congressional offices, including bricks thrown through windows at at least 4 offices in three states, she has said she will refuse to tone down her use of violent imagery and language.

That refusal has drawn criticism even from former supporters like Elisabeth Hasselbeck, co-host of the talk show, "The View," who had campaigned for Palin in Florida, called the gunsight map "despicable." Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/03/27/1549689/palin-denounces-violence-but-gun.html#ixzz0jOTjyYpB

But buried in that story was a choice tidbit that reveals just how little  loyalty -- when she's expected to give it and is not herself trying to get it -- means to the resigned Alaska governor.

All 20 of the Democrats targeted by gunsights on the map on her website are right-leaning Democrats in GOP-leaning districts who had crossed party lines to support Palin and her presidential running mate, John McCain.

How does Palin pay them back for that act of supposed political courage, going against their own party? By putting them 'in the crosshairs' of  her political action committees efforts to dump them and elect politicians loyal to Palin, presumably in order to shore her potential support for a presidential run.

Nice, huh?

Conservative scholar David Frum fired from American Enterprise Institute for criticizing GOP all-or-nothing health vote strategy

In this minor shocker from the right, we find out just how much liberty and freedom of speech really mean to the people who fund conservative institutions like the once respected American Enterprise Institute -- which has reportedly forbidden Institute staffers like former George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum from discussing the health care reform debate -- because too many of the  staffers reportedly agree with too much of the Obama health care initiative.

The   American Enterprise Institute apparently  fired conservative blogger and analyst David Frum -- who had held a resident fellowship at the AEI for seven years --   in the wake of criticism from  conservative political forces like the Wall Street Journal  and, crucially, large donors to the Institute, reportedly furious with an article on Frum's  blog site suggesting the GOP's all-or-nothing strategy of trying to stonewall health care reform had resulted in the most significant conservative GOP legislative loss since the 1960s.

Although Frum says no mention of the hailstorm of right wing criticism was made during his sacking,  fellow conservative commentator, Bruce Bartlett (who has also been under fire from the big money right for truth-talking) wrote that Frum had told him that American Enterprise Institute had forbidden Frum and other AEI staffers from discussing healthcare reform in the media -- because, Frum indicated, the Institute staffers agreed with too much of Obama's health care agenda.

Read more in the Washington Post.

"Attack" on Cantor office result of "random gunfire" according to police

Looks like Eric Cantor's me-too threat claims have blown up in his face. According to Richmond police, the bullet had been fired upward into the air and fell with a downward trajectory, striking Cantor's office window at a steep angle, but still with enough force to break the window. The spent slug fell just inside the broken window.

The cynical among us may jump to presume that the late night gunfire was the result of one of Cantor's drunken, gun-toting constituents getting a little frisky.

And -- if Cantor had been on the other side in this debate -- it seems likely that at least some anti-government types would have suggested that what America needs is more guns in the hands of more drunks. 

 Heaven forbid.


 [I posted these comments a few minutes ago here.]

Wave of tea party inspired attacks and threats

Tea party blogs appear to have inspired a wave of attacks on offices (and apparently a home) and threats against Democratic  legislators.

Incidents were reported in a number of states, including death and other threats of violence, an apparent attack on the home of the brother of a Virginia congressman -- local tea party blogs mistakenly posted the brother's address and suggest tea party sympathizers "drop by" and "thank" him for his vote on health care reform -- and a wave of broken windows at Democratic offices in a number of states inspired by anti-health care reform blogger in Alabama, Mike Vanderboegh, who had urged his readers angry at Democrats who voted for health care reform to "break their windows." His readers obliged, throwing bricks through windows of four Democratic party or congressional district offices in Kansas, Arizona, and two in New York state.

The tea party blogs that published and re-published the address of the brother of Virginia Democrat, Rep. Tom Perriello (thinking it was his), attempted to distance themselves from the attacks, according to an account in the Los Angeles Times:

Tea party officials said they did not encourage or condone attacks on Perriello's family or property.

"We wanted people to go by and talk to their congressman," said Nigel Coleman, who heads the Danville Tea Party. Coleman posted the address on his Facebook page after a member of the nearby Lynchburg Tea Party had posted the address on a blog.

Mark Lloyd, who heads the Lynchburg Tea Party, said the group, "condemn[s] violence," and that the posting never appeared on the group's official site.